home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT1185>
- <title>
- Sep. 05, 1994: Capitol Hill:A Chance to Be Heard
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Sep. 05, 1994 Ready to Talk Now?:Castro
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- TIME ON CAPITOL HILL, Page 24
- A Chance to Be Heard
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> Consumed by debates over health-care reform and the crime bill,
- legislators have left four other major issues to languish. With
- votes on these expected before the 103rd Congress adjourns this
- fall, there is still time to influence the outcome. Time invites
- you to use the attached postcard to express your views.
- </p>
- <p> GATT: Last December 117 nations agreed on a plan to revise the
- General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. The changes in the global
- pact would reduce tariffs on manufactured goods, cut agricultural
- subsidies, tighten the protection of intellectual-property rights
- and create a new mechanism to mediate future trade disputes.
- Congress is considering whether to approve U.S. participation
- in the agreement. Opponents ranging from Pat Buchanan to Ralph
- Nader warn that the new treaty would require the U.S. to defer
- to a supranational body on such matters as automobile-emission
- levels, product warning labels and safety standards. Supporters
- say the revised treaty could help America's economy grow an
- additional $200 billion annually, or about 3% a year, over the
- next decade. The Clinton Administration hopes to persuade Congress
- to approve the agreement this fall without any amendment, under
- the so-called fast-track procedure, calling for a single up-or-down
- vote.
- </p>
- <p> TELECOMMUNICATIONS: In an effort to keep up with rapidly changing
- technology, both houses have been working to update the laws
- and regulations that govern the telephone and television industries,
- with the goals of encouraging competition and accelerating construction
- of the information superhighway. In June, by comfortable margins,
- the House passed two bills (now combined into one, designated
- HR3626) intended to increase competition among cable-TV and
- phone companies. The bill would permit regional phone companies,
- the so-called Baby Bells, to get into the long-distance phone
- business from which they are now barred in exchange for granting
- their competitors, including cable-TV companies, access to their
- transmission and switching systems. The bill would also allow
- cable-TV companies and long-distance carriers to provide local
- phone service. In the Senate on Aug. 11, the Commerce Committee
- sent to the floor S1822, a bill that would permit the same process
- but stipulates that the Baby Bells cannot enter long-distance
- markets until the Justice Department and the Federal Communications
- Commission confirm that they have opened their lines to competitors.
- That could take several years. The House version lets them in
- after one year, regardless of competition. The House version
- is expected to go to the Senate floor in September.
- </p>
- <p> INTERSTATE BANKING: In late July, House and Senate conferees
- reached agreement on HR3841, the interstate banking bill, which
- would allow bank holding companies to establish separately managed
- and capitalized banks and branches in more than one state. Its
- sponsors claim that the legislation will make banking more convenient
- for customers and foster a leaner, stabler and more profitable
- banking system. A Senate vote was delayed Aug. 9, when Texas
- Republican Phil Gramm lodged a point of order involving his
- state's banking laws. Final action is expected sometime after
- Labor Day.
- </p>
- <p> LOBBYING AND GIFTS: For more a year, legislators have been struggling
- with the delicate issue of how much they should disclose about
- their contacts with lobbyists as well as the gifts and favors
- proffered by them. Based on votes taken in May 1993, the Senate
- is prepared to ban all gifts except those from friends and relatives.
- The House, however, has so far shown a willingness to permit
- certain gifts and favors from lobbyists, such as subsidized
- conferences and trips on behalf of charitable causes. Under
- discussion is a compromise that would bar acceptance of any
- "gifts of value," a term as yet undefined, from lobbyists, as
- well as recreational trips paid for by interest groups. Such
- a compromise would still allow each body to set its own rules
- governing gifts from nonlobbyists. How such rules would be enforced
- remains another open issue.
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-